Friday, September 21, 2018

Why Didn't I Tell?


Why didn’t I tell my mom when I saw her, seconds after six boys had cornered me in the library, pushed me up against the wall, put their hands all over me, including on my crotch, and whispered obscenities in my ear? I was twelve years old—I could talk. Why didn’t I tell my parents about the ongoing abuse I was experiencing in the neighborhood, about the older boy who took us up into a tree house, had us all pull our pants down, and then rubbed his cheeks across each of our behinds? Did I think they wouldn’t believe me? Why wouldn’t I tell someone about that? Why didn’t I tell them about the creepy employer who stacked Christmas presents, so he could have me stand on a chair and reach for them, so he would, he informed me, have to hold me around my legs? Why didn’t I just say, “Hey, it was really creepy how he put his hand on mine on the tape while I wrapped packages. And he closed the door and stayed with me to do the work. I don’t want to work there any more.” He was a friend of my father’s—why didn’t I tell my dad when he picked me up?

I was never raped. I grew to be about six feet tall by the time I was 14, and I think that may have helped to deter those who look for vulnerabilities in women. Although, it may also just be luck—I don’t attribute any skill or knowledge to myself that prevented it. But I have been assaulted, on multiple occasions, most of them happening when I was still a child. Most were the acts of other children, though many involved children significantly older than I was. And outside of counseling sessions, I have told very few people. Not even my best friends in life know about these events. Why? People are asking, a lot lately, why a woman would come forward, years, even decades after abuse or assault or rape, and accuse a prominent man of doing something horrendous to her. I’ll tell you this for certain: they do not come forward for the publicity. They do not come forward for some political agenda. They do not come forward just to mess with the prominent man’s life, or to gain money or fame. Those are the acts of a psychopath. It is highly unlikely that women who show no other signs in their life of being psychopaths would, in this one area and only in this one instance, have all the traits of one.

There are two things to understand about incidents of assault, particularly sexual assault. First: they are trauma. Have you ever had a broken bone or a deep cut which required stitches? These are traumas to the body. Everything shuts down. The instinct is to fold in, to protect. I can picture my children, who between them had something like 12 broken bones, in the ER, holding the hurt limb to themselves, quietly leaning against me as we waited for treatment. Psychological trauma works the same way—it shuts things down. The instinct is to fold in, to protect. I may want to get out of the situation, but beyond that, I am not thinking about much at all. I am not thinking about stopping this person from doing this again; I am not thinking about justice or vengeance, either one. I just want to get myself out and to protect the broken place, the wound that has happened inside of me.

Second: power. Power structures are at work here. Let’s say there comes a moment of healing, when I might begin to process that I should tell someone what happened. By then, time has passed. I probably have no proof. I have no visible harm. It’s my word against his. And he already showed me that he was willing to hurt me. And he has power over me—that is what enabled him to do this in the first place: he was stronger, or had more money, or had more status. Whatever it was, he felt invulnerable—safe in acting out and grabbing what he wanted. And, as it turns out, he was right. The system is decidedly in his favor. It is no secret in our society what happens to women or men who step forward to say that someone more powerful than they are abused that power and hurt them. The entire system comes down on their head and they are re-traumatized, forced, not only to live again through the first trauma (which they had steeled themselves to do in coming forward), but now hit with a new trauma, the assault on their person, their integrity, their sanity.

It is so much easier just to let it go and to get on with our lives, which is what most of us do. Deep inside, we believe that we were at fault in some way—we let it happen. And that seed stays with us, providing yet another voice which says, “Let’s not talk about that with anyone.” Power’s favorite tool is the “bad apple.” Anyone who attacks it must be insane. Anyone in power actually caught with their hand in the cookie jar (and you have to catch them, in flagrente delicto, or you just go back to step one, that the person claiming to be a victim is insane) is just a “bad apple.” The exception, and not the rule. DEFINITELY NOT the system itself. Power is more than willing to sacrifice the odd member from the inside in order to protect the system (see Anthony Weiner).

The bad news, for all of us, is that this country was set up by rich, powerful, white men, for rich, powerful, white men. The sooner we all recognize the truth of that, the better off we are going to be. The good news, for all of us, is that those particular rich, powerful, white men wrote in a universal language. They had an idealism, which they might not have been able to completely pull off, but which they wrote into our documents. And so each person among us who is not white reads those documents and applies them to him or herself. Each woman, who is, in places, completely ignored in the language of those documents, reads those documents and sees herself. Each person coming from elsewhere in the world, reads those documents and dreams that they could apply to him or herself. We believe that equality is out there for us to claim. We believe that those rights are ours by birth as well.

Power is a bully, and bullies are boringly predictable. They have no creativity, no tools except whichever one (strength, money, status) they are used to using to get their way. And they are wildly fragile. The slightest word throws them into a tizzy, which they vomit onto the entire population of the system.  And there is only one cure for bullies: bullies have to be fought. I’m not an advocate for violence, so let me be clear what I mean by the word “fought.” Observably, fighting a bully goes like this:

Step 1: Call the bully out. Out him. Say, in public, “This is what he did.” Have whatever proof you can.

Step 2: Keep calling the bully out. Never, ever, ever, ever, ever, let him get away with doing what he does in secrecy. Bullies love nothing more than secrecy. “Let’s keep this in-house,” means “I want to be able to get away with again.”

Step 3: Set up policies, systems, back-ups, transparencies, guidelines, protocols, and procedures which protect the most vulnerable people in your system. Anyone can be vulnerable, including many white males. You have to look at your own system to see who is actually vulnerable. Do the work.

Step 4: Use the goddamn policies. Write people up. Put things in their file. Fire them. Fire everyone from CEO’s to janitors who will not work within respectful guidelines.

Step 5: Try not to be naïve. THIS WILL HAPPEN AGAIN. THIS WILL HAPPEN IN YOUR SYSTEM. MOST LIKELY, THESE KINDS OF ABUSES ARE ALREADY HAPPENING INSIDE YOUR SYSTEM. Power would like nothing more than for us to continue, Pollyanna-like, believing that our system doesn’t have problems like these.

I recognize that I have used a masculine pronoun for bullies throughout this writing. I know that females can be bullies, too—and, incidentally, they are no more creative or interesting than male bullies. They are just as boring, just as short-sighted, and all the steps listed above apply to them as well. But they tend not to be sexually abusive—it happens, and should be addressed. But in our systems, men have the power. A small number of white men have the power. Best to start there. Power always rolls downhill—if we, as a culture, begin to truly address the power we have given to a very small number of pasty-faced boys who lucked into money, we will be able to deal with all the other bullies as we go.

Why didn’t I tell? How could I have told? Why would I have told? Who would I have told? It never occurred to me to tell anyone. As with most people who have had traumatizing experiences, I have needed decades of time to process; that may be the actual way we as human beings deal with them. What should we do when someone comes forward? Stop worrying that she is a psychopath, first of all. A psychopath will have a history of pathology. I don’t mean looking to see if she has ever been treated for depression—of course she has. She was assaulted and traumatized. Seeking mental health treatment does not make someone a psychopath. I have sought mental health treatment—I recommend it for all human beings who have a brain. But a psychopath does not just suddenly appear on the planet, out of nowhere—it is a false story-line of power that this could be so. And someone who came forward with a false story in order to win fame or money is a psychopath. Women who step forward to tell their stories do so with enormous courage, tremendous thought and fortitude.

Do this. Try believing her. Our system is set up in such a way that THE MOST LIKELY SCENARIO is that she is telling the truth. He has every reason to have done this, as he believes himself to be invulnerable (as the system has taught him that he is); she has no reason to lie. None. There is no advantage for her to come forward with a lie. Believe her story. Every word. Give the power, for that moment, to her. Put it in his record: “On this day, this person informed us that she was sexually assaulted by this man.” In his record. One other thing that you can absolutely guarantee is that he did not do this just once. If we begin rewarding people who come forward with stories of how they were sexually abused—and the only reward they want is to be believed—then more will do so. If the system supports them, they will do so. And the stories in his record will add up; the truth will come out.

Another false theory of our culture is that somehow punishment is what stops people from behaving badly. Observably, this is not true. The existence of the word “recidivism” should tell us that. What stops people from behaving badly is stopping them from behaving badly. Being fired from jobs because you cannot keep from touching people inappropriately will effectively keep you out of the workplace. Losing status, losing power, because you use abusive language, embarrass people publicly and take advantage of them privately will take you out of positions where you can continue your abuse. It is wrong to believe that we have to get all these men behind bars. Because it is such an aversive and dire punishment, it is actually what has kept the boys in power: “You don’t want to take away everything he has worked for just because of one little indiscretion? He doesn’t deserve to go to jail for that!” Prison is stupid. It doesn’t work. It never has. It breeds systems of abuse and bullying and secrecy of its own that only feed the existing power structure. We all know this, and yet we cannot stop ourselves from the visceral desire to hurt someone, to take something away from them if they hurt us. That is stupid. And it doesn’t work.

What works is stopping them. What works is outing them. What works is refusing to be part of systems of secrecy. What works is setting up systems which protect the people who are vulnerable instead of protecting the most powerful person in the system. If you’re the most powerful person in the system, you deserve some protection, but you are already protected, to a great degree, by being the most powerful person in the system. It is everyone else who needs protection. Each of us needs to get our system’s shit together. Protect our people. Protect ourselves. And stop giving leaders and bosses and CEO’s and coaches and congressmen and governors and presidents the permission to do whatever they goddamn please on a daily basis. It is the daily protections that shut down the long-term ones. Get them in place. Use them.

And when someone summons up the courage to step forward and tell his or her story of how a person of power abused them, fucking believe them.



Thursday, July 19, 2018

Defending the Gospel

Here in Lynchburg, the language around religion and a life of faith is decidedly different than that in many other municipalities. Lynchburg has been deeply influenced by the presence of Liberty University and the theology it espouses. One of the pat phrases I have heard, quite a bit, since I arrived here this spring has been, "We need to defend the gospel." In this theology, the thinking goes something like this:
1. Scripture is sacred. Every word in it is sacred.
2. Our job is to defend its sacred nature by following it as closely as we can.
And, ok--I'm with you that scripture is sacred. I might even say to you that I agree that every word is sacred. I spent 8 1/2 years studying that sacred word, learning Hebrew and Greek, pondering word after word after word. I am into words--a former English teacher with two degrees in English and Rhetoric, I like to think I understand words and grammar--I like knowing whether a verb is in the imperative, or what noun an adjective is modifying. Not to mention that, for the 40 years before I went to seminary, I was in Sunday School and church pretty much every Sunday. To say that every word is sacred, however is not the equivalent of taking every word literally, which, as approach to a text like our Bible, is a ridiculous thing to say. I recognize, of course, that saying that the literal approach is "ridiculous" is going to make some people mad. I think it is a shame that they will get mad, because the insistence on talking about the Bible as "literal" is a silliness--not even history books are literal--they always reflect the bent of the writer, the effects of the culture. They are always story, and story is never literal. A basic of study of literature will teach this understanding of all the writing that ever was.
I also believe, because I have been watching this for almost 40 years, that "defending the gospel" is code--in my experience it offers the speaker three things:
1. An excuse to keep women out of ministry leadership.
2. An excuse to exclude people who identify as LGBTQ.
3. A permission to interfere in the lives of others (i.e. abortion law).
Have this conversation with someone, and see if you don't end up talking about one of those three things. They are anxious to defend the gospel--against powerful women. They are willing to stand firm and make sure no person who is on the LGBTQ spectrum--and no person who associates with those persons--is allowed into their culture. They are willing to sacrifice anything to make sure that some other woman has to put aside her own decision and do what THEY want with her body.
Here's what I would ask:
First, what do you mean by the gospel? If you mean the four books which are The Gospels, you should know that Jesus provides for the ministry of women, and for their empowerment, and says absolutely nothing about homosexuality (as if the modern concept of homosexuality were even available to the culture of that time). Is that the gospel you are defending? Are you defending Mary's right to sit at the feet of Jesus with the men, a position Jesus himself defended, saying to Martha that it was the better choice and that it would not be taken from Mary (Luke 10:42)? Is that the gospel you are defending? 
Second, if, by "defending the gospel," what you mean is the entirety of scripture, I would ask you which one? Does yours include the Apocrypha? Is it only the KJV, or do you equally defend The Message? Do you defend Leviticus 19:33-34 ('When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord you God.")? Are you standing up for the refugees who come to our borders, welcoming them as brothers and sisters, in fear that you would fail in the task--one that is often reiterated in scripture--to welcome the foreigner or stranger as commanded in "the gospel?" Do you defend the rights of women, based on the choosing of Deborah as judge for the people of Israel, based on the heroism of Esther, based on the ordination of Phoebe as deacon of the church? Do you welcome everyone carefully, humbled by the words of Galatians 3:28 ("There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus"), understanding the the default setting of the gospel is that gender is not something with which we need to concern ourselves?
I have been working hard to get along with people from every walk of faith here in Lynchburg--I like people. I like connecting with people. And I have no problem with people who disagree with me about the interpretation of scripture. But I also believe that my theology of scripture is as valid as anyone else's. I have earned the right, by my scholarship, by my faithfulness, and by my labor, to have my own theology of scripture. And I guess this blog is my fair warning--I am readying myself to share it more openly in Lynchburg. Defending the gospel, in my theology, includes defending people from bad theology--from harmful theology, which casts  people out, which condemns and threatens, which costs people their family members, which leaves refugees by the side of the road, or separates them from their children and places them in detention. So, fair warning--I am putting on the armor of God--I am readying for battle. I am preparing to step forward and defend the gospel.




Thursday, January 25, 2018

Self-Rescue

When I entered the adult world, I had never had a female doctor. Initially, I really didn't want one. I was used to male doctors, and going to a male doctor seemed easier. Pretty soon, though, I began to realize that if I was going to ask to be treated fairly in my own profession, I should support women in other professions. So, I intentionally went out and sought a female to be my OB/GYN. The first one was kind of like Ms. Trunchbull in Matilda: she was a bully, and kind of mean about everything. I was terrified of her, and had to really struggle to give myself permission to go find another one. The next one was very competent--very smart, quiet and decent. She was very gentle and helped me through my first pregnancy. She wasn't a great advocate though. I don't mean to generalize--in fact, I mean not to--but I haven't yet found a female doctor who was a good fit for me.

Lately, there has been a resurgence of conversation about women in ministry. Should women teach in seminaries? Should women be pastors? At 54, and as someone who has been having to listen to this question and the stupid debates around it since I was 20 years old (and, incidentally, representing Southern Baptists on a Summer Mission Team), here is what I want to say:

                       I AM VERY SORRY THAT YOU ARE STILL DEALING WITH
                       YOUR STUPID FEARS ON THIS ISSUE. YOU ARE MISSING
                       OUT ON SOME OF THE MOST QUALIFIED, MOST DYNAMIC,
                       MOST SKILLED, AND MOST MOTIVATED HUMAN BEINGS
                       CURRENTLY IN THE FIELDS OF MINISTRY AND EDUCATION.

Women are normal human people. Some of them are going to do well at this work, and some of them aren't. They're going to bring their issues and their skills, and those are going to vary to the same degree that they do with men. Having a female in a position of leadership is not going to solve all your problems. If you believe that hiring females is going to solve all your problems, you are mistaken; if, however, you are still stuck in the rut of status quo and patriarchy--if you are still arguing about whether or not a woman SHOULD be ALLOWED to fulfill her calling from God, then you do not deserve to have any woman offer her gifts around you or for you. And you are missing out on some amazing people.

If you are a woman called to teach those of us who are called to be ministers, stop listening to those stupid voices. There's no ARGUMENT for women in those positions. Some women are going to be wonderful as seminary professors and ministers; some are not. They are going to succeed and fail based on all the same factors that cause men to succeed or fail. But whether they get the chance to do their best to fulfill their calling is not worthy of argument. It's not an opinion. God didn't just call men--God called women. The biblical narrative is full of them. Jesus didn't just call men--he called women. Those boys wouldn't have survived five minutes without Martha and the Marys. And I don't just mean that they provided food for the men to do the thinking.

Stop justifying your right to fulfill your calling from God. Nobody wins an argument with God (Read the end of the book of Job), and God has already issued the ruling on this. No cherry-picking of verses can erase Debora, the Judge; or Esther; or Phoebe. The time has come for women to stop arguing and just go about the business of doing what we are called to do. Be brave: that is decidedly biblical. Stand up for yourself by doing your job and doing it well, and never allowing anyone to tell you who you are or what you should be. Set your boundaries and stand by them. This is what grown-ups do. Don't wait for someone else to defend you--defend yourself.

In the language of rock climbing and white water rafting, they talk about self-rescue. Before you depend on someone else to risk his or her life to rescue you from the situation you're in, do everything you can to rescue yourself. That is where women are right now. It is time for us to self-rescue. And any moron who still wants to argue about whether it is right or normal or theologically sound for women to lead men on their spiritual journey is welcome to do that in their sad little corner of like-minded cretins. Many of you will be amazing at this work; some of you will be terrible at it; pretty much all of us will struggle with it, because of our own limitations, from time to time. But the time for niggling arguments is past. Get out there and teach; go forth and preach. Rescue your own damn self. And save all your pity for those sad people in the corner, clutching their Bibles like smokers banished to some carport in the rain, who will inevitably get left behind.